Legal Opinion
George Washington University v. Violand
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided January 31, 2008No. 04-CV-1237PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
2Per curiam
On consideration of appellant’s motion for leave to file the lodged petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc, the response thereto, and appellee’s motion to file the lodged errata sheet, it is
ORDERED that the motions are granted and the Clerk is directed to file the lodged appellant’s petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc and the lodged errata sheet of appellee.
It is FURTHER ORDERED by the merits division * that the petition for rehearing is granted to the extent that this court’s opinion filed September 20, 2007, (932 A.2d 1109, D.C.2007), is hereby vacated. That opinion issued…
3Cases cited22 opinions
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Corning Glass Works v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Harper v. Virginia Department of TaxationSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by7 opinions
- Washington Convention Center Authority v. JohnsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Halcomb v. Office of the Senate Sergeant-At-ArmsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Massey v. MasseyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2019
- Baker-Notter v. Freedom Forum, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- Massey v. MasseyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.