Legal Opinion
United States v. Smart
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 4, 2008No. 06-6120PublishedCited by 157 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LUCERO, Circuit Judge.
Christopher Wayne Smart was convicted of inducing a minor to engage in sexually explicit conduct for the purpose of producing videotapes depicting such conduct in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2251(a). Exercising its discretion under United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), Smart’s sentencing court concluded that his United States Sentencing Guidelines (“Guidelines”) range of 168 to 210 months’ imprisonment overstated the seriousness of his offense, and varied downward, imposing a sentence of 120 months’ imprisonment. The government…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Kimbrough v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Johnson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by157 opinions
- United States v. GardelliniCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Alapizco-ValenzuelaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. WellsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. HutchinsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. SellsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
152 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.