Legal Opinion

Laughlin v. Fresenius Medical Care Holdings Inc

District Court, E.D. Washington

Decided January 30, 2024No. 2:23-cv-00180Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 6 7 LINDA LAUGHLIN, Individually and for Others Similarly Situated, NO. 2:23-CV-0180-TOR 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S 9 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR v. FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM 10 FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE 11 HOLDINGS, INC. d/b/a/ FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE 12 NORTH AMERICA, and RENAL CARE GROUP, INC., 13 Defendants. 14 15 BEFORE THE COURT is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for Failure to 16 State a Claim (ECF No. 28). This matter was submitted for consideration without 17 oral argument. The Court has reviewed the record and…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API