Ex Parte Casey
California Supreme Court
APPLICATION for a Writ of Habeas Corpus directed to the Warden of the California state prison at Folsom. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
From the return made to the court by the warden of the California state prison at Folsom, in response to the writ of habeas corpus issued herein, and the matters alleged in the petition for the writ, which were admitted by the attorney-general to be true, it was confessed by the attorney-general and satisfactorily appeared to the court that the petitioner was entitled to be discharged from custody. It was accordingly so ordered. That the reasons for such action may appear of record, this opinion is filed.
The petitioner was convicted of. a felony, and adjudged to be imprisoned…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Ex Parte McGuireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Ex Parte MortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
3Cited by17 opinions
- In Re FlueryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Redway v. WalkerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1945
- In Re SichofskyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Commonwealth v. Polsgrove, County JudgeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
- Aguilera v. California Dept. of CorrectionsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.