State v. Webb

MURPHY, Judge.

*361 The issue underlying Maurice Jason Webb-Sholar's (Defendant) arguments on appeal is whether the State put forth sufficient substantial evidence that he personally committed the crimes appealed herein. For the reasons that follow, we hold that this case is analogous to State v. Ethridge , 168 N.C. App. 359 , 607 S.E.2d 325 (2005), and, thus, there *362 was sufficient evidence that Defendant perpetrated the crimes to support a jury finding, of each essential element of the offense *184 charged, and of Defendant being the perpetrator of each offense.

Defendant argues that: (1) there was…