Legal Opinion
Pincus Hueter v. Kruse
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 18, 2022No. Civil Action No. 2020-3686Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA STEVEN JAY PINCUS HUETER, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:20-cv-03686 (TNM) LEALAIALOA FRITZ MICHAEL KRUSE, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Originally proceeding pro se, and now with counsel, Steven Jay Pincus Hueter asserts claims against over 70 Defendants relating to actions taken by the Government of American Samoa. Before the Court are multiple motions, including one from Secretary of the Interior Deb Haaland to dismiss Hueter’s claims against her. The Court will grant that motion and dispose of three others currently ripe for…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.