Legal Opinion

Bornstein v. District Grand Lodge No. 4

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 9, 1906No. Civ. No. 110PublishedCited by 14 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial. Frank H. Kerrigan, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, P. J.

The defendant is a beneficial association incorporated under the laws of this state, of which Sigmund Bornstein was a member from November 11, 1875, until his death, March 6,1901. December 1, 1891, the defendant issued to said Bornstein its “beneficiary certificate,” by which it agreed that, upon condition that the said Bornstein should comply with the laws, rules and regulations then governing the defendant or that thereafter might be enacted for its gov- eminent, and should he in good standing at the time of his death, and a contributor to the widows’ and orphans’ beneficiary fund of the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Kent v. . Quicksilver Mining Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1879
  2. Knights Templars' & Masons' Life Indemnity Co. v. JarmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  3. Gray v. President of the Portland BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1807
  4. Commonwealth v. WetherbeeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  5. Carnes v. Iowa State Traveling Men's Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Bennett v. Hibernia BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Tu-Vu Drive-In Corp. v. AshkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Spencer v. Hibernia BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Fort v. Iowa Legion of HonorSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  5. Valentine v. Head Camp, Pacific Jurisdiction, Woodmen of the WorldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API