Legal Opinion

46th Circuit Trial Court v. Crawford County

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 27, 2007No. Docket Nos. 254180, 256129, 257234PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

This matter originally involved six consolidated cases involving the same parties.1 On remand, we address three of the six consolidated cases. We affirm as to Docket Nos. 256129 and 257234, reverse as to Docket No. 254180, and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

I. BACKGROUND

We issued one opinion in the consolidated cases on May 3, 2005, 46th Circuit Trial Court v Crawford Co, 266 Mich App 150, 702 NW2d 588 (2005).2 The Michigan Supreme Court

*85granted the defendant counties’ application for leave to appeal, limited to the questions: (1) whether the appropriations sought…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Catalina Marketing Sales Corp. v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Ashker v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. 46th Circuit Trial Court v. Crawford CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
  4. 46th Circuit Trial Court v. Crawford CountyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. LaFond v. RumlerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Crawford Cty. v. Otsego Cty.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API