United States v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Maryland, Incorporated, Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association, Amicus Curiae
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ERVIN, Chief Judge:
This case presents the question whether an insurance company offering gap-filling coverage to Medicare patients may construe its coverage to exclude reimbursement to VA hospitals because the hospitals do not derive benefits first from the Medicare system. We hold that it may not, and affirm the district court.
I
The facts of this case are straightforward and undisputed. Eleven veterans, who held Medicare supplemental (“medi- gap”) policies issued in Maryland 1 by Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Maryland, Inc. (“BCBS”), received medical care and treatment at the Department…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. State of New Jersey Violent Crimes Compensation BoardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- United States v. State of Maryland Criminal Injuries Compensation Board of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. State of OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Maryland, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1992
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gill v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Maryland, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. Capital Blue CrossCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Hirshberg v. CoonWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
- United States v. Blue Cross/blue Shield of AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.