Legal Opinion

United States v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Maryland, Inc.

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided May 14, 1992No. Civ. No. Y-90-2653PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

JOSEPH H. YOUNG, Senior District Judge.

Plaintiff brings this action pursuant to 38 U.S.C. § 1729 (the “non-discrimination” act) to recover the cost of care and services furnished to eleven veterans at a Veterans Administration Medical Center, Martins-burg, West Virginia. The eleven veterans are “Medicare eligible” and covered by Medicare Supplemental Insurance Policies provided by Defendant Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Maryland.1

Section 1729 provides that the United States is entitled to recover benefits from a “third party payor” for services rendered to a veteran at a VA hospital…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. State of New Jersey Violent Crimes Compensation BoardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
  2. United States v. State of Maryland Criminal Injuries Compensation Board of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Maryland, Incorporated, Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association, Amicus CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
  2. United States v. Capital Blue CrossDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API