Legal Opinion

Cederquist v. Archuleta

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 26, 1953No. 16968PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Alter

In an action tried in the juvenile court, Alvin Cederquist was found to be the father of a child and contributing to its dependency. The child was born subsequent to the filing of the petition and prior to the trial of the case.

A motion for new trial, in which numerous grounds in support thereof were set out, was filed and overruled, and time allowed within which to tender a bill of exceptions, during which time the court determined a motion filed by petitioner for an order directing payment into the registry of the court of a reasonable sum for the support and maintenance of the minor child,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Davidson v. JenningsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1900
  2. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. Van FleetSupreme Court of Colorado · 1910
  3. Dikeou v. People in the Interest of CassidentiSupreme Court of Colorado · 1934
  4. Metzger v. People Ex Rel. Unborn Child of ConzoneSupreme Court of Colorado · 1936
  5. Davis v. People Ex Rel. GrantSupreme Court of Colorado · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Geisler v. People Ex Rel. GeislerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
  2. Burton v. City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  3. McCoy v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
  4. Proudfit v. CoonsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API