Cederquist v. Archuleta
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Alter
In an action tried in the juvenile court, Alvin Cederquist was found to be the father of a child and contributing to its dependency. The child was born subsequent to the filing of the petition and prior to the trial of the case.
A motion for new trial, in which numerous grounds in support thereof were set out, was filed and overruled, and time allowed within which to tender a bill of exceptions, during which time the court determined a motion filed by petitioner for an order directing payment into the registry of the court of a reasonable sum for the support and maintenance of the minor child,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Davidson v. JenningsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1900
- Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. Van FleetSupreme Court of Colorado · 1910
- Dikeou v. People in the Interest of CassidentiSupreme Court of Colorado · 1934
- Metzger v. People Ex Rel. Unborn Child of ConzoneSupreme Court of Colorado · 1936
- Davis v. People Ex Rel. GrantSupreme Court of Colorado · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Geisler v. People Ex Rel. GeislerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
- Burton v. City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court · 1960
- McCoy v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
- Proudfit v. CoonsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1958