Legal Opinion

Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. Van Fleet

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 15, 1910No. 5912PublishedCited by 29 opinions

Appeal from Denver District Court — Hon. Frank T. Johnson, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Campbell

This is an action to recover on a policy of accident insurance. Plaintiff, the beneficiary and widow of the insured, who met his death as the result of an accident, had judgment, and defendant appealed.

More than two years after the cause was at issue in this court, and after it was noted for oral argument, appellee filed a motion to strike from the files the bill of exceptions, ruling upon which was reserved until final hearing. The principal ground of the motion is that there was no proper showing that the bill contained all of the evidence produced at the trial. This motion is not tenable…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Insurance Co. v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Northern Assurance Co. v. Grand View Building Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
  3. New York Life Insurance v. FletcherSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. Phoenix Life Ins. Co. v. RaddinSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  5. McMaster v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1901

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. More v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
  2. Benefit Association of Ry. Employees v. SecrestCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  3. Shaner v. West Coast Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
  4. New York Life Insurance v. FukushimaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923
  5. Geisler v. People Ex Rel. GeislerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API