Legal Opinion

Poulos v. F. H. Hill Co.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 1948No. 30599. Reversed and remandedPublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Fulton

This is an appeal from a decree of the superior court of Cook County dismissing a bill of complaint seeking to restrain the appellee from maintaining a fire escape so as to overhang a lot of appellants, by which decree the appellee was declared to have a perpetual easement over the lot of appellants. Inasmuch as the decree declared an easement and an easement involves a freehold, a direct appeal to this court is authorized. Espenscheid v. Bauer, 235 Ill. 172.

It appears from the record, and the master so found, that the appellants, hereinafter called plaintiffs, were owners in fee simple, as…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Waller v. HildebrechtIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Illinois Central Railroad v. HoughtonIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Towle v. QuanteIllinois Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Bontz v. StearIllinois Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Rush v. CollinsIllinois Supreme Court · 1937

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Petersen v. CorrubiaIllinois Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Plaza v. FlakSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
  3. Allendorf v. DailyIllinois Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Sanchez v. Dale Bellamah Homes of New Mexico, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Light v. StewardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API