Legal Opinion
So. Plainfield v. Middlesex County
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided October 20, 2004PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
859 A.2d 463 (2004)
372 N.J. Super. 410
SOUTH PLAINFIELD PROPERTIES, L.P., a Delaware Limited Partnership, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
MIDDLESEX COUNTY PLANNING BOARD, Defendant-Appellant, and
Township Committee of Piscataway, Defendant.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued September 14, 2004.
Decided October 20, 2004.
F. Clifford Gibbons, Princeton, argued the cause for appellant (Maselli Warren, attorneys; Mr. Gibbons, of counsel and on the brief).
William J. O'Hagan, Jr., Neptune, argued the cause for respondent (Stout & O'Hagan, attorneys; Mr. O'Hagan, of counsel; Michael V.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Manalapan Holding Co. v. Planning Board of HamiltonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
- Lizak v. FariaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- Fallone Properties, L.L.C. v. Bethlehem Township Planning BoardNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004
- Allied Realty, Ltd. v. Borough of Upper Saddle RiverNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
- Precision Industrial Design Co. v. BeckwithNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Amerada Hess Corp. v. Burlington County Planning BoardSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2008
- Cicchine v. Tp. of WoodbridgeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2010