Legal Opinion
Cicchine v. Tp. of Woodbridge
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided February 10, 2010No. DOCKET NO. L-416-09PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
995 A.2d 318 (2010)
413 N.J. Super. 393
George CICCHINE and Mona Cicchine, Plaintiffs,
v.
TOWNSHIP OF WOODBRIDGE and Township Of Woodbridge Planning Board (Intervenor), Defendants.
DOCKET NO. L-416-09
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.
Decided: February 10, 2010.
John R. DeNoia, Woodbridge, for plaintiff (John DeNoia, L.L.C., attorneys).
Eric J. Lange, Woodbridge, for defendant (JP Nolan & Associates, L.L.C., attorneys).
Marc J. Rogoff, Fords, for intervenor.
HURLEY, J.S.C.
The plaintiffs, George Cicchine and Mona Cicchine (collectively referred to as "Cicchines") are the owners of real property…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Charlie Brown of Chatham, Inc. v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT FOR TOWNSHIP OF CHATHAMNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
- Lubliner v. BD. OF ALCOHOLIC BEV. CON., CITY OF PATERSONSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- Plainfield-Union Water Co. v. Borough of MountainsideSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- King v. New Jersey Racing CommissionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
- Manalapan Holding Co. v. Planning Board of HamiltonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- New Castle County v. Pike Creek Recreational Services, LLCCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2013
- VINELAND ICE & STORAGE, LLC VS. CITY OF VINELAND (L-0673-16, CUMBERLAND COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2020