Legal Opinion
Badlam v. Reynolds Metals Co.
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided April 19, 1999No. 95 CV 1100, 95 CV 1105 and 95 CV 1118PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM — DECISION & ORDER
McAVOY, Chief Judge.
The three female plaintiffs herein, Edna Norton (“Norton”), Patricia Badlam (“Bad-lam”), and Susan McGregor (“McGregor”), commenced the instant litigation against the Defendants Reynolds Metals Company (“Reynolds”) and The Aluminum Brick and Glass Workers International Union Local No. 450 (the “Union”) asserting claims pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), New York State Human Rights Law § 296 (“HRL”), and common law causes of action for negligent hiring, retention and supervision. Plaintiff Norton also asserts a…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Prestopnik v. WhelanDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2003
- Petrosky v. New York State Department of Motor VehiclesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1999
- Martin v. New York State Department of Correctional ServicesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2002
- Pueschel v. NATIONAL AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLERS ASS'NDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Dyke v. McCleaveDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2000
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.