Legal Opinion

City of Tucson v. Polar Water Co.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 1954No. 5607PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WINDES, Justice.

For the facts reference is made to the former opinion, 76 Ariz. 126, 259 P.2d 561.

From a consideration of the motion for rehearing, we find some confusion in the minds of counsel for plaintiff and amici curiae 'concerning the effect of the original opinion, and while we do not depart from the ultimate conclusion reached therein, we do feel that some clarification and modification of the reason for such conclusion are warranted.

We held that section 16-604, A.C. A.1939, has no application to the fact situation here presented where a municipality merely expands its territory and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Clayton v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1931
  2. City of Tombstone v. MacIaArizona Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Menderson v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1938
  4. City of Tucson v. Polar Water Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1953

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. City of Mesa v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power DistrictArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Application of Trico Electric Cooperative, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Unity Light & Power Co. v. City of BurleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
  4. City of Billings v. HeroldMontana Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Mohave Disposal, Inc. v. City of KingmanArizona Supreme Court · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API