Legal Opinion
Huge v. Overly
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 16, 1978No. Civ. A. 75-869PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DUMBAULD, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, trustees of the United Mine Workers of America Health and Retirement Funds, hereinafter sometimes referred to as plaintiff or the trust fund, is a pension plan organized pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 186(c)(5).
It js required by 29 U.S.C. § 186(c)(5) that the trust fund be used “for the sole and exclusive benefit of the employees” and by 29 U.S.C. § 186(c)(5)(B) that “the detailed basis on which such payments are to be made [be] specified in a written agreement with the employer.” 1 Any oral modification of such a written agreement would be invalid and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lewis v. Benedict Coal Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Lewis v. Seanor Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
- Lewis v. Harcliff Coal CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1965
- Boyle v. North Atlantic Coal CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1971
- Huge v. Old Home Manor, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Nachwalter v. ChristieCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
- Nachwalter v. ChristieCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
- Julius Mullins v. Kaiser Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- Talarico v. United Furniture Workers Pension Fund ADistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1979
- Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Inc. v. National Benefit Fund for Hospital & Health Care EmployeesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.