Legal Opinion
Julius Mullins v. Kaiser Steel Corporation
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided May 4, 1981No. 79-1463PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MIKVA, Circuit Judge:
This suit was brought against Kaiser Steel Corporation (Kaiser) by the Trustees of the United Mine Workers of America Health and Retirement Funds, seeking payment of contributions due to these funds under the terms of the National Bituminous Coal Wage Agreement of 1974 (1974 Agreement). Kaiser’s principal defense was that the contract provision sued on was illegal under both the antitrust prohibitions of the Sherman Act, §§ 1-2, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1-2 (1976), and the “hot cargo” proscriptions of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), § 8(e), 29 U.S.C. § 158(e) (1976).…
2Cases cited59 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. LivingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Kaiser Steel Corp. v. MullinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Leonard v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Andrew Toth v. Usx CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- District No. 1, Pacific Coast v. Liberty Maritime CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Joan Eddy, of the Estate of James Peter Eddy v. Colonial Life Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.