Gopro, Inc. v. Contour IP Holding LLC
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Reyna, Circuit Judge.
GoPro, Inc. appeals from final written decisions of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board in two inter partes review proceedings. In the proceedings, the Board found that the petitioner, GoPro, did not demonstrate that the challenged claims are unpatentable as obvious. The Board based this decision on its conclusion that a certain GoPro catalog is not a prior art printed publication. We disagree. We vacate and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
BACKGROUND
A. The '954 patent and '694 patent
Contour IP Holding LLC owns U.S. Patent Nos. 8,890,954 ("the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Constant v. Advanced Micro-Devices, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- In Re Leo M. HallCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Kyocera Wireless Corp. v. International Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Blue Calypso, LLC. v. Groupon, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- In Re Carol F. Klopfenstein and John L. Brent, JrCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. Infobridge Pte. Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Weber, Inc. v. Provisur Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2024
- M & K Holdings, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021
- Centripetal Networks, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021
- Contour IP Holding, LLC v. GoPro, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2021
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.