Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. Infobridge Pte. Ltd.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
O'Malley, Circuit Judge.
In two inter partes review proceedings requested by Samsung, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board ("the Board") upheld all challenged claims of U.S. Patent 8,917,772 ("the '772 patent"), which is owned by Infobridge. The Board upheld the claims because it found that Samsung failed to show that a certain prior art reference was publicly accessible before the '772 patent's critical date and thus could not be considered prior art. Samsung appeals the Board's decisions, insisting that it has standing to do so and arguing, among other things, that the Board applied the wrong…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Biestek v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Summers v. Earth Island InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Constant v. Advanced Micro-Devices, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- M & K Holdings, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021
- Centripetal Networks, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021
- Lynk Labs, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2025
- Moderna Tx, Inc. v. Arbutus Biopharma CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021
- Modernatx, Inc. v. Arbutus Biopharma CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021