State v. York
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*537PETERSON, J.
Defendant appeals her conviction of theft and assault arising from a shoplifting incident after which she stabbed a store employee who confronted her. The case was tried to the court without a jury. She assigns as error the denial of her motion for mistrial based on claimed misconduct of the prosecutor in advising prospective witnesses that “it would be better if we didn’t say anything” to the defense. The Court of Appeals did not express approval of the prosecutor’s advice, but affirmed the conviction.1
The state called the store manager and the assault victim as witnesses. The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Lewis v. Lebanon Court of Common PleasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of AinsworthOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- Coppolino v. HelpernDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
- Mota v. BuchananCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- State v. ZehOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. MaiOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- Lisle v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. BenOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- State Ex Rel. O'Leary v. LoweOregon Supreme Court · 1989
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.