State v. Zeh
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.
The narrow issue presented in this appeal is whether, in the interests of providing a fair trial in a criminal proceeding, a victim-witness must submit to a pre-trial, extra-judicial, psychological or psychiatric examination conducted at the request of the defendant when the results of such examination are reasonably necessary to contest expert testimony presented by the state, applicable to an essential element of the crime charged. Although we must answer such query in the negative, we do so conditionally.
*102The prosecutor argues that the trial court properly denied the motion to require the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Hopkinson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
- Commonwealth v. St. PierreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- United States v. Lonnie M. Brown, Robert L. Newsome, James B. Finney, Julian E. Seymour, Jr., and Benjamin Clyde Cranford, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- People v. PeterIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
- Baxter v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by101 opinions
- State v. GreenOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. ShortOhio Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. ShortOhio Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. ScudderOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. RobinsonOhio Supreme Court · 2009
96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.