Legal Opinion

State v. Zeh

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1987No. 86-943PublishedCited by 101 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.

The narrow issue presented in this appeal is whether, in the interests of providing a fair trial in a criminal proceeding, a victim-witness must submit to a pre-trial, extra-judicial, psychological or psychiatric examination conducted at the request of the defendant when the results of such examination are reasonably necessary to contest expert testimony presented by the state, applicable to an essential element of the crime charged. Although we must answer such query in the negative, we do so conditionally.

*102The prosecutor argues that the trial court properly denied the motion to require the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Hopkinson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Commonwealth v. St. PierreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  3. United States v. Lonnie M. Brown, Robert L. Newsome, James B. Finney, Julian E. Seymour, Jr., and Benjamin Clyde Cranford, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  4. People v. PeterIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Baxter v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by101 opinions

  1. State v. GreenOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. ShortOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  3. State v. ShortOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  4. State v. ScudderOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. RobinsonOhio Supreme Court · 2009

96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API