Legal Opinion

Madore v. Liberty National Bank

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided March 29, 1972PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POMEROY, Justice.

The Commissioner’s decision, in the absence of fraud upon all questions of fact shall be final. 39 M.R.S.A. § 99.

No fraud is alleged.

The Commissioner has found facts which have led him to this legal conclusion:

“ . . .at the time of his unfortunate accident Mr. Madore was not an employee of the Respondent bank, but was rather an independent contractor and therefore, not entitled to the benefits of the Workmen’s Compensation Act.”

This appeal from the pro forma decree of the Justice of the Superior Court has brought the issue before us. We agree the ultimate conclusion of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Murray's CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1931
  2. Dobson's CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1925
  3. White v. Monmouth Canning CompanySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1967
  4. In Re DudleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1969

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Timberlake v. Frigon & FrigonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
  2. Bourette v. Dresser Industries, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
  3. Cardello v. Mt. Hermon Ski Area, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977
  4. West v. C.A.M. LoggingSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  5. Owen v. Royal Industries, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API