West v. C.A.M. Logging
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
CLIFFORD, Justice.
Richard West appeals from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission denying his petition for award based on a finding that he was an independent contractor and therefore not entitled to workers’ compensation benefits. 39 M.R.SA §§ 2(5)(A)(7), 2(13) (Supp.1992). Because the Commission “ ‘misconceive[d] the meaning of the applicable legal standard,’ ” Stone v. Thorbjornson, 656 A.2d 1211, 1214 (Me.1995) (quoting Timberlake v. Frigon & Frigon, 438 A.2d 1294, 1296 (Me.1982)), based its decision on irrelevant factors, and ignored the clear weight of evidence pointing to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Murray's CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1931
- Riley v. Bath Iron Works Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
- Timberlake v. Frigon & FrigonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
- Kirk v. Yarmouth Lime Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1940
- Madore v. Liberty National BankSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hanson v. Transportation General, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- RLI Insurance v. Agency of TransportationSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
- North East Insurance v. SoucySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997
- Doughty v. Work Opportunities Unlimited/Leddy GroupSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
- Larry Huff v. Regional Transportation ProgramSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.