Legal Opinion

West v. C.A.M. Logging

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided February 5, 1996PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLIFFORD, Justice.

Richard West appeals from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission denying his petition for award based on a finding that he was an independent contractor and therefore not entitled to workers’ compensation benefits. 39 M.R.SA §§ 2(5)(A)(7), 2(13) (Supp.1992). Because the Commission “ ‘misconceive[d] the meaning of the applicable legal standard,’ ” Stone v. Thorbjornson, 656 A.2d 1211, 1214 (Me.1995) (quoting Timberlake v. Frigon & Frigon, 438 A.2d 1294, 1296 (Me.1982)), based its decision on irrelevant factors, and ignored the clear weight of evidence pointing to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Murray's CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1931
  2. Riley v. Bath Iron Works Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
  3. Timberlake v. Frigon & FrigonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
  4. Kirk v. Yarmouth Lime Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1940
  5. Madore v. Liberty National BankSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hanson v. Transportation General, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  2. RLI Insurance v. Agency of TransportationSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
  3. North East Insurance v. SoucySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997
  4. Doughty v. Work Opportunities Unlimited/Leddy GroupSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
  5. Larry Huff v. Regional Transportation ProgramSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API