State v. Larkin
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtGkosse, J.
Michael H. Larkin appeals his convictions on two counts of first degree robbery. Larkin claims his convictions violate the double jeopardy clause of the United States and Washington State Constitutions. Larkin contends the two counts must merge for purposes of sentencing. In addition, Larkin challenges the validity of the information charging him with the robbery. The State cross-appeals, claiming that the trial court erroneously calculated the offender score for sentencing by not including Larkin's prior rape conviction. We affirm the conviction and remand for resentencing.
On September…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Albernaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- State v. KjorsvikWashington Supreme Court · 1991
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. GockenWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. McJimpsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
- State v. McJimpsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
- State v. PastranaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
- State v. PastranaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.