Legal Opinion

State v. Larkin

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 3, 1993No. 25761-7-IPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGkosse, J.

Michael H. Larkin appeals his convictions on two counts of first degree robbery. Larkin claims his convictions violate the double jeopardy clause of the United States and Washington State Constitutions. Larkin contends the two counts must merge for purposes of sentencing. In addition, Larkin challenges the validity of the information charging him with the robbery. The State cross-appeals, claiming that the trial court erroneously calculated the offender score for sentencing by not including Larkin's prior rape conviction. We affirm the conviction and remand for resentencing.

On September…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Albernaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. State v. KjorsvikWashington Supreme Court · 1991

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. GockenWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. McJimpsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
  3. State v. McJimpsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
  4. State v. PastranaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
  5. State v. PastranaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API