Legal Opinion

Hans Oetiker v. Jurid Werke, G. M. B. H

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided March 4, 1977No. 75-1897PublishedCited by 81 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEVENTHAL, Circuit Judge:

This case involves a patentee’s potential liability for fraudulent procurement and enforcement of a patent. A Swiss inventor claims that a German manufacturing com pany sought a United States patent on certain secrets in violation of an agreement between them, obtained the patent by fraud on the Patent Office, and used it to exclude the inventor from selling a similar good in certain markets. After the complaint was filed, the company disclaimed the patent, and the district court dismissed the action on the grounds that the disclaimer had mooted all federal claims. We…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Rosado v. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by81 opinions

  1. IUE AFL-CIO Pension Fund v. HerrmannCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  2. James Cameron v. Richard Thornburgh, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
  3. ESAB Group, Inc. v. Centricut, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
  4. Avocent Huntsville Corp. v. Aten Intern. Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
  5. United States v. BotefuhrCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API