People v. Saffold
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GILBERT, P. J.
Defendant is convicted for disobeying a domestic relations order. (Pen. Code, § 273.6, subd. (a).) As evidence that he was served with notice of the order, the trial court admitted the proof of service.
Here we conclude that the admission of this evidence did not violate his right to confront witnesses under Crawford v. Washington (2004) 541 U.S. 36 [158 L.Ed.2d 177, 124 S.Ct. 1354],
David Bruce Saffold appeals a judgment after conviction of felony elder abuse, misdemeanor false imprisonment, and seven counts of misdemeanor disobeying a domestic relations order. (§§ 368,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Leavitt v. AraveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- People v. GarciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- People v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- San Diego County Department of Social Services v. ForsytheCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. KirkpatrickWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. KirkpatrickWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- People v. TaultonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- State v. MurphySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
- Commonwealth v. ShangkuanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.