Moritz Implement Co. v. Matthews
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Larson, J.:
This case involves a first-impression issue of who is entitled to crops growing upon real property sold in a foreclosure sale. John Matthews and various of his creditors with perfected security interests in crops growing upon his land appeal the decision of the trial court holding title to the unharvested crops passed to the purchaser at the foreclosure sale, Moritz Implement Company, Inc. (Moritz). They also appeal the order of the trial court awarding Moritz attorney fees under the terms of a promissory note, as allowed by K.S.A. 58-2312.
Fa…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kansas Public Employees Retirement System v. Reimer & Koger Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1997
- Snodgrass v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1990
- United States v. A. D. NewcombCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- Anna National Bank v. PraterAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
- Beckman v. SikesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wachter Management Co. v. Dexter & Chaney, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2006
- Smith v. RussellSupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
- Southwest State Bank v. Ellis (In Re Ellis)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2004
- Magstadtova v. MagstadtCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2003