Legal Opinion

Magstadtova v. Magstadt

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided October 24, 2003No. 89,558PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Pierron, J.:

Thomas Magstadt appeals from the district court’s judgment ordering him to pay attorney fees and costs to Stepanka Magstadtova under the International Child Abduction Remedies Act (ICARA), 42 U.S.C. § 11601 et seq. (2000). We affirm.

On July 27, 2001, Stepanka filed a petition under the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (the Convention), Oct. 25, 1980, T.I.A.S. No. 11,670, 1343 U.N.T.S. 89; see 53 Fed. Reg. 30637 (1988), and the ICARA, 42 U.S.C. § 11601 et seq. Stepanka alleged she was the mother of Michael Magstadt, then 10 years old, and that…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. White v. New Hampshire Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Budinich v. Becton Dickinson & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Stanfield v. Osborne Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1997
  4. Winston v. Kansas Dept. of SRSSupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
  5. Dalmasso v. DalmassoSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wentland v. UhlarikCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API