Legal Opinion

United States v. Keith Lamonte Hill, A/K/A Keith Lamont Hill, A/K/A Michael Lane Robinson

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided January 7, 1992No. 89-2833PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

The Supreme Court — U.S. —, 111 S.Ct. 2845, 115 L.Ed.2d 1014 has vacated our prior judgment in this case, United States v. Hill, 911 F.2d 129 (8th Cir.1990), and has remanded the case to us for further consideration in light of its recent decision in Burns v. United States, — U.S. —, 111 S.Ct. 2182, 115 L.Ed.2d 123 (1991). In our previous decision we rejected Hill’s argument that he did not receive sufficient notice of a possible upward departure from the sentencing guidelines, and accordingly, we affirmed Hill’s conviction for interstate transportation of stolen property and his sentence of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Burns v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. United States v. Keith Lamonte Hill, A/K/A Keith Lamont Hill, A/K/A Michael Lane RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. Marlin Hawk WingCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
  2. United States v. Ella M. AndruskaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  3. United States v. Harold Hall Paslay, A/K/A Pat PaslayCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
  4. United States v. Richard R. StarnesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
  5. Kenneth Carpenter, Sr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API