Legal Opinion

United States v. Richard R. Starnes

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided February 14, 2001No. 00-2729UnpublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Richard R. Starnes was charged in an eight-count indictment with possessing altered money orders, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 500. He pleaded guilty to Count 1 of the indictment in exchange for the government’s dismissal of the remaining seven counts. A presentence report was prepared, which yielded a guidelines range of 15 to 21 months imprisonment. The district court departed upward from the guidelines range, imposing the statutory maximum of five years. Starnes objected to the lack of prior notice of the district court’s intention to depart upward and to the extent of the departure. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Burns v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. United States v. Cheryll S. Coon, United States of America v. Ferrell Travis RileyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
  3. United States v. Kanchan Bala Sharma, Also Known as Kay Bala, Also Known as Kay Daken, Also Known as Kanchan B. DakenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
  4. United States v. Keith Lamonte Hill, A/K/A Keith Lamont Hill, A/K/A Michael Lane RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States of America, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Casey Marie Yirkovsky, Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
  2. United States of America, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Casey Marie Yirkovsky, Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
  3. United States v. Casey M. YirkovskyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API