Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Moody v. Able Outdoor, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 15, 2005No. COA03-1493Published

1ConcurrenceTyson, Judge

Because plaintiff could have asserted this cause of action in Case I but failed to do so, I vote to reverse the trial court’s order. Any dis*88cussion of Case II is unnecessary to resolve this appeal. I respectfully concur in the result only of the majority’s opinion.

I. Res Judicata

Under the doctrine of res judicata, “a final judgment on the merits in a prior action will prevent a second suit based on the same cause of action between the same parties or those in privity with them.” Thomas M. McInnis & Assoc., Inc. v. Hall, 318 N.C. 421, 428, 349 S.E.2d 552, 556 (1986). “The doctrine of res…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Thomas M. McInnis & Associates, Inc. v. HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  2. Bockweg v. AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  3. Gaither Corporation v. SkinnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  4. Caswell Realty Associates I, L.P. v. Andrews Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  5. Stafford v. County of BladenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API