Moody v. Able Outdoor, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1ConcurrenceTyson, Judge
Because plaintiff could have asserted this cause of action in Case I but failed to do so, I vote to reverse the trial court’s order. Any dis*88cussion of Case II is unnecessary to resolve this appeal. I respectfully concur in the result only of the majority’s opinion.
I. Res Judicata
Under the doctrine of res judicata, “a final judgment on the merits in a prior action will prevent a second suit based on the same cause of action between the same parties or those in privity with them.” Thomas M. McInnis & Assoc., Inc. v. Hall, 318 N.C. 421, 428, 349 S.E.2d 552, 556 (1986). “The doctrine of res…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Thomas M. McInnis & Associates, Inc. v. HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- Bockweg v. AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
- Gaither Corporation v. SkinnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Caswell Realty Associates I, L.P. v. Andrews Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
- Stafford v. County of BladenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.