Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Village of Fridley v. City of Columbia Heights
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 6, 1952No. 35,638PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Thomas Gallagher, Justice.
Quo warranto proceedings instituted here by the village of Fridley against the city of Columbia Heights to determine the validity of certain annexation proceedings whereby an irregularly shaped area of land lying entirely within the village of Fridley is sought to be annexed to the city of Columbia Heights, and requiring the city of Columbia Heights and its elected officials to show why *126they should not he ousted from exercising jurisdiction over territory wholly within the corporate limits of the village of Fridley.
The village of Fridley was incorporated June 9,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Stern v. City of FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
- Wheeler School District No. 152 v. HawleyWashington Supreme Court · 1943
- State Ex Rel. Danielson v. Village of MoundSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- Village of North Fargo v. City of FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1923
- Kansas City v. StegmillerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Borgelt v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Town of Forest Acres v. SeiglerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1953
- State Ex Rel. Nelson v. City of AnokaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953