State v. Seay
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Judge.
Defendant first contends that a preliminary hearing is required before a probation revocation hearing can be held. We disagree.
G.S. 15A-1345(c), which outlines when a preliminary hearing on a probation violation is required, states “Unless the hearing required by subsection (e) is first held or the probationer waives the hearing, a preliminary hearing on probation violation must be held. . . .” Subsection (e) requires that before probation can be revoked or extended, a hearing is required at which the judge “must make findings to support the decision.” The record shows that the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. HewettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. DuncanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. BraswellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- State v. McClureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. FreemanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. WilliamsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. TerryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- State v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
- State v. BelcherCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- State v. McMURRINCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.