Legal Opinion

State v. Seay

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 7, 1982No. 8221SC485PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

Defendant first contends that a preliminary hearing is required before a probation revocation hearing can be held. We disagree.

G.S. 15A-1345(c), which outlines when a preliminary hearing on a probation violation is required, states “Unless the hearing required by subsection (e) is first held or the probationer waives the hearing, a preliminary hearing on probation violation must be held. . . .” Subsection (e) requires that before probation can be revoked or extended, a hearing is required at which the judge “must make findings to support the decision.” The record shows that the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. HewettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. State v. DuncanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. State v. BraswellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  4. State v. McClureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  5. State v. FreemanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  2. State v. TerryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  3. State v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  4. State v. BelcherCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  5. State v. McMURRINCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API