Legal Opinion

Austin v. New Brunswick Fire Insurance

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1940No. 8,085PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Erickson

This appeal is from a judgment of the district court of Lewis and Clark county in favor of the plaintiff after its order denying a new trial. The trial was had before the court sitting without a jury. The facts out of which this controversy arose are these:

Some time during the month of May, 1929, John G. Brown met Russell H. Hart, one of the members of the firm of Hart & Hart, and discussed with him the purchase by Brown of automobile insurance from the Hart firm. It is undisputed that at the time and for a considerable period afterwards the firm of Hart & Hart was the agent of the two…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Finkelberg v. Continental Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1923
  2. People ex rel. Kasson v. RoseIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Bachman v. Independence Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
  4. American Automobile Ins. Co. v. ConeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  5. A. Rose & Son, Inc. v. Zurich General Accident, Etc., Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Granco Steel, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Transamerica Insurance v. Glacier General Assurance Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Transamerica Ins. Co. v. Glacier GeMontana Supreme Court · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API