Legal Opinion

Miller v. Southern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 28, 1933PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeogdeN, J.

There was sufficient evidence of negligence and of contributory negligence, and as the jury answered both of these issues in the affirmative, the determinative question is whether the trial judge should have submitted to the jury the issue of last clear chance.

Peril and the discovery of such peril in time to avoid injury constitutes the back-log of the doctrine of last clear chance. Was the plaintiff’s intestate in a situation of peril at the crossing ? Did his car stall on the track? Did he look and listen before attempting to cross? The evidence does not speak upon any of these questions.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Redmon v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1928

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ingram v. . Smoky Mountain Stages, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  2. Wade Ex Rel. Wade v. Jones Sausage Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. Matheny v. Central Motor Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  4. Irby v. Southern Railway CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  5. Earle v. WyrickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API