Legal Opinion
United States v. Herbert Ackerman
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided April 21, 1980No. 78-2391PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
This is an appeal from the denial of a pro se motion to vacate, set aside, or correct the sentence of a federal prisoner pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1976). The appellant, Herbert Ackerman, has raised two grounds for relief: (1) that in accepting his guilty plea, the trial judge did not fully and completely discharge his duty under Fed.R. Crim.P. 11; and (2) that he was denied his Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel. We affirm the judgment of the district court denying the Rule 11 claim, but vacate and remand for a hearing on the question whether…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. TimmreckSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Gratton Earl Moore v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Local 862, International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. Williams, Ronald Alfred, Ronald A. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by16 opinions
- Steven A. Shraiar v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
- United States v. FerriCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Swainson v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- United States v. Francis D. Ferri A/K/A Rick Joseph Laverich. Appeal of Kenneth R. Matthews, Kenneth R. MatthewsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Gary GoldenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.