Legal Opinion

Ray v. Industrial Accident Commission

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 28, 1956No. Civ. 9033PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeek, J.

Petitioner seeks review of an award of the Industrial Accident Commission granting respondent-employee Wolgamott additional compensation by reason of the alleged serious and willful misconduct of the petitioner-employer under the provisions of Labor Code, section 4553.

The facts show that on February 16, 1954, Wolgamott, while operating an unguarded table saw sustained an injury admittedly arising out of and in the course of his employment. On January 31, 1955, after negotiation with the respondent insurance carrier, Wolgamott entered into a “Compromise and Release” of claim for the sum of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wennerholm v. Stanford University School of MedicineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Carter v. Seaboard Finance Co.California Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Mercer - Fraser Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Pac. Emp'rs Ins. Co. v. Indus. Accident Comm'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  5. R. J. Wilson Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Magliulo v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  2. Morehouse v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  3. Rubio v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API