Bunting v. Juras
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtLangtry, J.
This case involves an attack on the validity of Oregon Public Welfare Division Rule 5.436. This rule became effective December 15, 1971. The only part pertinent to the issue before us creates the presumption that the income of a stepfather is an available resource of a child who is eligible for benefits under the Aid to Dependent Children (ADC) provisions of the Social Security Act of 1935 as amended. 42 USC § 601 et seq. (1971); ORS 418.035 to 418.175. The plaintiffs and the class they represent are all mothers receiving ADC benefits on behalf of children who would have their ADC benefits…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Rosado v. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- King v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Lewis v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
3Cited by6 opinions
- Triplett v. Board of Social ProtectionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
- Slochowsky v. LavineNew York Supreme Court · 1973
- Ruth M. Archibald v. Frank WhalandCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977
- Drago v. Public Welfare DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
- Schofield v. Public Welfare DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.