Slochowsky v. Lavine
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBertram Harnett, J.
Support of stepchildren is óften a family problem. But, sometimes it is a public concern.
TJnder'the Federal public assistance program called Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC), family income is considered in determining a child’s eligibility for relief. All of a-natural father’s income is typically deemed available to his child, but the situation is more complicated where stepfathers are found. The Federal regulations allow consideration of all of the stepfather’s income in estimating the child’s eligibility only if the applicable State law establishes a general obligation on all…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Rosado v. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- King v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Townsend v. SwankSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Lewis v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Matter of Kane v. NecciNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- In re the Estate of KummerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Gemmiti v. BeagleNew York City Family Court · 1978
- Post v. MooreNew York Family Court · 1979
- Brown v. HecklerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
- Freda v. LavineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.