Legal Opinion

Hains v. Pointe Coupee Parish Government

District Court, M.D. Louisiana

Decided September 4, 2024No. 3:22-cv-00835Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA AMY HAINS CIVIL ACTION 22-835-SDD-RLB VERSUS POINTE COUPEE PARISH GOVERNMENT, POINT COUPEE PARISH COUNCIL, AND MAJOR THIBAULT RULING This matter is before the Court on the pending Motion for Partial Summary Judgment1 filed by Plaintiff, Amy Hains (“Plaintiff” or “Hains”). Local rule 7(f) of the Middle District of Louisiana requires that memoranda in opposition to a motion be filed within twenty-one (21) days after service of the motion. Despite this rule, Defendant, Pointe Coupee Parish Government (“Defendant” or “the Parish”) failed…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API