Legal Opinion
In re Harstad
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided February 7, 1992No. Bankruptcy No. 4-90-869PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER DISALLOWING CLAIM NO. 242
ROBERT J. KRESSEL, Chief Judge.
This case came on for hearing on the debtors’ objection to claim no. 242 filed by ITT Commercial Finance Corporation. James L. Baillie appeared on behalf of the debtors and Brian F. Kidwell appeared on behalf of ITT. This court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 157 and 1334 and Local Rule 201. This is a core proceeding under § 157(b)(2)(B). Based on the memo-randa, arguments of counsel and the file in this case, I make the following memorandum order.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
ITT Industrial Credit Company1 loaned…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Dahmes v. Industrial Credit Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- Hansen v. AdentSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Fidelity Bank & Trust Co. v. FitzimonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- National City Bank of Minneapolis v. LundgrenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- Schmidt v. McKenzieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Omni Enterprises, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Alaska · 2020