Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. McKenzie

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 9, 1943No. 33,364PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Julius J. Olson, Justice.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment entered pursuant to an order granting defendant Westerman’s motion “for judgment of dismissal on the merits” of plaintiff’s cause upon the pleadings.

His complaint alleges that on November 29, 1939, Engesser Brewing Company borrowed $10,000 from him and on that date executed its corporate note, of which the following is a copy:

“St. Peter, Minn. November 29, 1939
“One year after date, for value received, I promise to pay to the order of Edward A. Schmidt
“Payable at the First National Bank of St. Peter, St. Peter, Minnesota,
“Ten thousand…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Reese v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  2. Barns v. . BarrowNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  3. Simonson v. GrantSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  4. Schoonover v. Osborne Bros.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1899
  5. J. R. Watkins Medical Co. v. McCallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Dahmes v. Industrial Credit Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  2. Estate of Frantz v. PageCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  3. American Tobacco Co. v. ChalfenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  4. Clark v. Otto B. Ashbach & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  5. Minnesota Laborers Health & Welfare Fund v. Granite Re, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2014

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API