Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. O'Connell

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 24, 1936PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtField, J.

This is a complaint under G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 271, § 7, charging the defendant with being “concerned in the setting up, managing and drawing of a certain lottery.” On appeal the case was heard on an agreed statement of facts by a judge sitting without a jury. The judge denied requests for rulings and a motion for a finding of not guilty, and the defendant excepted. The judge found the defendant guilty, imposed a fine, stayed further proceedings and, with the consent of the defendant, reported the case to present the questions of law arising therein. G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 278, § 30.

G. L. (Ter.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SullivanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  2. Commonwealth v. Boston & Maine Transportation Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  3. Commonwealth v. MackayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
  4. Commonwealth v. McClintockMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  5. Commonwealth v. Theatre Advertising Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Greater Loretta Imp. Ass'n v. State Ex Rel. BooneSupreme Court of Florida · 1970
  2. Commonwealth v. WallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  3. Carroll v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
  4. Dorman, Et Vir. v. Publix-Saenger-Sparks Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1938
  5. Harriman Institute of Social Research, Inc. v. Carrie Tingley Crippled Children's HospitalNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API