Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Theatre Advertising Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 25, 1934PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPierce, J.

These are two complaints charging the defendants with keeping and maintaining a gaming nuisance in the city of Boston, i.e., premises “resorted to for illegal gaming.” The complaints were tried to a jury and resulted in verdicts of guilty as to both defendants. Upon motions the complaints were consolidated for the purpose of filing and presenting the exceptions of the defendants to the Supreme Judicial Court.

*407There was evidence that the defendants conducted in Keith’s old theatre on Washington Street, in Boston, a game, known as “Beano,” in the following manner. Along one side of the lobby of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Ellison v. . LavinNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
  2. Hudelson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Murphy v. RogersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State Ex Inf. McKittrick v. Globe-DemocratSupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  2. Commonwealth v. LakeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  3. Commonwealth v. PlissnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  4. State Ex Rel. Tyson v. TED'S GAME ENTER.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2002
  5. Commonwealth v. O'ConnellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API