Mazik v. Geico Gen. Ins. Co.
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
1Opinion of the CourtLui, P. J.
*458GEICO General Insurance Company (GEICO) appeals from a judgment against it awarding punitive damages to respondent Michael Mazik for GEICO's bad faith breach of an insurance contract. A jury concluded that GEICO unreasonably delayed paying its policyholder Mazik the policy limits of $ 50,000 on an underinsured motorist policy after Mazik was injured in a serious automobile accident. The jury awarded compensatory damages of $ 313,508 and punitive damages in the amount of $ 4 million. The trial court subsequently reduced the punitive damages to $ 1 million.
GEICO appeals only the punitive…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Egan v. Mutual of Omaha InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- White v. Ultramar, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1999
- Roby v. McKesson Corp.California Supreme Court · 2009
- Shade Foods, Inc. v. Innovative Products Sales & Marketing, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2000
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bonnie Jue v. Unum GroupDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021
- Collins v. Nationwide Agribusiness Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020
- Nargizyan v. State Farm Gen. Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 2026
- Verotel Merchant Services B v. v. Rizal Commercial Bank CA2/4California Court of Appeal · 2021