Legal Opinion

Mazik v. Geico Gen. Ins. Co.

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided May 17, 2019No. B281372PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLui, P. J.

*458GEICO General Insurance Company (GEICO) appeals from a judgment against it awarding punitive damages to respondent Michael Mazik for GEICO's bad faith breach of an insurance contract. A jury concluded that GEICO unreasonably delayed paying its policyholder Mazik the policy limits of $ 50,000 on an underinsured motorist policy after Mazik was injured in a serious automobile accident. The jury awarded compensatory damages of $ 313,508 and punitive damages in the amount of $ 4 million. The trial court subsequently reduced the punitive damages to $ 1 million.

GEICO appeals only the punitive…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. Egan v. Mutual of Omaha InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. White v. Ultramar, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Roby v. McKesson Corp.California Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Shade Foods, Inc. v. Innovative Products Sales & Marketing, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2000

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bonnie Jue v. Unum GroupDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021
  2. Collins v. Nationwide Agribusiness Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020
  3. Nargizyan v. State Farm Gen. Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 2026
  4. Verotel Merchant Services B v. v. Rizal Commercial Bank CA2/4California Court of Appeal · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API