Palace Cafe v. Hartford Fire Ins.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LINDLEY, District Judge.
Defendants appeal from judgments entered against them upon two insurance policies. The policy of the Hartford Fire Insurance Company covered loss of property by riot, civil commotion, or explosion; that of the National Security Fire Insurance Company, loss of use and occupancy occasioned by riot, civil commotion, and explosion. The losses for which claim was made under each policy were caused by an .explosion, which destroyed plaintiff’s property located on leased premises.
Defendants assert as error that there was no substantial evidence to support the verdicts; that…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Leverone v. ArancioMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
- Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. CarrollIndiana Supreme Court · 1917
- Pearl v. West End Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
- Spring Garden Ins. v. Amusement Syndicate Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1910
- Mills v. DillonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- McVeigh v. McGurrenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
- D'Allessandro v. BechtolCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939
- Hartford Fire Insurance v. Palace Cafe, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Co. v. GrahamIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989