Legal Opinion
D'Allessandro v. Bechtol
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided June 30, 1939No. 9100PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLMES, Circuit Judge.
This appeal is from a judgment on a verdict for the plaintiff in an action for damages for personal injuries resulting from being struck by an automobile belonging to appellant George D’Allessan-dro, while the same was being operated by appellant Pete D’Allessandro. The points raised are the sufficiency of the declaration, the propriety of the exclusion of certain documentary evidence, and the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict.
A demurrer on behalf of George D’Al-lessandro was sustained to the first declaration filed by appellee, the allegation as to him…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Gunning v. CooleySupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. CoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. GroegerSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Southern Cotton Oil Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1920
- Gardner v. Michigan Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Heimann v. National Elevator Industry Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- Rabideau v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- Cropper v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 1948
- Carter v. DavisonWyoming Supreme Court · 1961
- Carter v. DavisonWyoming Supreme Court · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.