Legal Opinion

Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. Carroll

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1917No. 23,273PublishedCited by 21 opinions

From Marion Superior Court (92,338); Theophilus J. Moll, Judge. ■ Action by William H. Carroll against the Fidelity and Casualty Company of Néw York. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals. (Transferred from the Appellate Court under §1405 Burns 1914, Acts 1901 p. 590.)

1Opinion of the CourtSpencer, C. J.

Action by appellee to recover attorney’s fee's for. services rendered. On appeal from a judgment for plaintiff, appellant contends that the Marion Superior Court erred in overruling its motion for a new trial and, under that assignment, challenges first the action of the superior court in denying it a change of venue from the judge. Appellant is a foreign corporation, having its principal office in the city of New’ York, but is doing business in this State, and the affidavit which accompanied the motion for a change of venue was executed for and on its behalf by its district or…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Burkett v. HolmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. American Soda Fountain Co. v. StolzenbachSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1908
  3. Shattuck v. MyersIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
  4. Jones v. Chicago & Northwestern R. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1872
  5. Krutz v. GriffithIndiana Supreme Court · 1879

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Menard, Inc. v. Dage-MTI, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Indiana Department of Public Welfare v. Chair Lance Service, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Gallant Insurance Co. v. IsaacIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Southern Surety Co. v. KinneyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1920
  5. Starr v. City of GaryIndiana Supreme Court · 1934

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API